← Latest briefing

US News

US citizen sues federal government for $25m, alleging wrongful ICE shooting

The Guardian reports that Carlos Jimenez has sued the federal government, alleging an ICE officer wrongfully shot him in October 2025.

The short version

  • Carlos Jimenez, a US citizen, filed a $25m lawsuit against the federal government over an alleged wrongful shooting and arrest by an ICE officer.[The Guardian]
  • The lawsuit alleges ICE officer Eusebio Ortiz fired into Jimenez's car during a three-point turn, hitting him in the back and right shoulder.[The Guardian]
  • DHS said at the time that Jimenez had tried to run officers over, a account that differs from the lawsuit's version of events.[The Guardian]
  • Federal assault charges against Jimenez were formally dismissed, according to the reporting, but the reasons for dismissal are not specified.[The Guardian]

Key facts

  • Carlos Jimenez, a US citizen, filed a $25m lawsuit against the federal government alleging he was wrongfully shot and arrested by an ICE officer.[The Guardian]
  • Jimenez was driving to work on 30 October 2025 when he drove by an ICE operation.[The Guardian]
  • The lawsuit says ICE officer Eusebio Ortiz pointed a firearm at Jimenez's face and threatened to shoot, citing audio from the officer's radio.[The Guardian]
  • According to the lawsuit, Ortiz fired multiple gunshots into the car during a three-point turn, hitting Jimenez in the back and right shoulder.[The Guardian]
  • A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said at the time that Jimenez had attempted to run officers over and that the officer fired defensive shots.[The Guardian]
  • The Department of Justice charged Jimenez with assault on a federal officer using a deadly or dangerous weapon.[The Guardian]
  • The criminal charges against Jimenez were formally dismissed.[The Guardian]

What remains uncertain

  • The lawsuit's allegations are unproven, and they conflict with the DHS spokesperson's earlier account that Jimenez tried to run officers over.[The Guardian]
  • The reasons for dismissing the criminal charges are not specified in the provided reporting.[The Guardian]
  • The outcome of the $25m lawsuit is unknown because it was only recently filed.[The Guardian]

Sources

Outlet counts describe coverage, not independent confirmation. Reports may share a wire service or original source.