Environment & Climate
American Farm Bureau foundation removes cattle methane lesson after rancher criticism
The Guardian reports the foundation removed a cattle methane lesson from a curriculum used by about 1.2 million students.
The short version
- The American Farm Bureau Foundation removed a cattle methane and climate lesson within months after rancher criticism.[The Guardian]
- The free curriculum reaches about 1.2 million students in more than 100 districts and is funded by the mandatory beef checkoff levy.[The Guardian]
- Education director Rick Henningfeld said in February the lesson was being edited, and it had not returned as of reporting.[The Guardian]
- A climate scientist says the lesson misstated livestock's share of methane emissions, while the USDA says it had no role in the removal.[The Guardian]
Key facts
- The American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture's free curriculum reaches about 1.2 million students across more than 100 US school districts.[The Guardian]
- The curriculum is funded by the beef checkoff, a mandatory levy on cattle sales.[The Guardian]
- A cattle methane and climate lesson was announced late last year and was removed within months after online criticism from ranchers.[The Guardian]
- The foundation's education director said at CattleCon in February that the lesson was taken down and is being edited.[The Guardian]
- A new July lesson on cattle digestion makes no mention of methane or climate.[The Guardian]
- In September, the USDA ordered checkoff programs to end support for ESG initiatives and net-zero targets.[The Guardian]
- The USDA said it had no role in the decision to remove the methane lesson.[The Guardian]
What remains uncertain
- Whether the removal was driven by industry pressure or by the September USDA directive is not established; the USDA denies a role in the removal.[The Guardian]
- The timing of any restored lesson is unknown; officials said they hope to restore it quickly, but it had not returned at reporting.[The Guardian]
- The livestock methane error is an allegation by one climate scientist, and the foundation's response to that claim is not reported in the available material.[The Guardian]
Sources
Outlet counts describe coverage, not independent confirmation. Reports may share a wire service or original source.