US News
Supreme Court agrees to weigh constitutionality of home liquor distilling ban
CBS News reports the justices will weigh an 1868 federal ban on home distilling, with arguments expected next year.
The short version
- The Supreme Court agreed to consider a challenge by the Hobby Distillers Association to a nearly 160-year-old federal home distilling ban.[CBS News]
- The 1868 law bars home production of spirits for personal use with no exceptions, and violators face fines, up to five years in prison, and forfeiture of property.[CBS News]
- A federal district court found the ban unconstitutional and the 5th Circuit largely upheld that finding, while the solicitor general calls the ruling erroneous.[CBS News]
- Arguments are likely next year, with a decision expected by late June or early July, though that timing is not yet confirmed.[CBS News]
Key facts
- The Supreme Court said it will consider the constitutionality of the nearly 160-year-old federal ban on home distilling.[CBS News]
- Arguments in Department of Justice v. McNutt are likely next year, with a decision anticipated by late June or early July.[CBS News]
- The 1868 law states that a person may not produce distilled spirits at home for personal use, and it includes no exceptions for personal or family use.[CBS News]
- Violations carry fines, up to five years in prison, and forfeiture of the violator's home and the property within it.[CBS News]
- Congress cited rampant tax evasion by commercial distillers when it enacted the restrictions, with lawmakers determining that at least seven-eighths of spirits went untaxed.[CBS News]
- The Hobby Distillers Association and one member who wants to distill at home brought the challenge, arguing the ban exceeds Congress's enumerated powers.[CBS News]
- A federal district court found the ban unconstitutional, and the 5th Circuit largely upheld that ruling, finding the limits not plainly adapted to the taxing power.[CBS News]
- Solicitor General D. John Sauer urged the Supreme Court to take the case, calling the lower ruling erroneous and arguing that home stills can conceal tax evasion.[CBS News]
What remains uncertain
Sources
Outlet counts describe coverage, not independent confirmation. Reports may share a wire service or original source.