Environment & Climate
EPA let Bayer select weedkiller regulations, internal documents reportedly show
The Guardian reports that internal agency records show the EPA allowed Bayer to choose its preferred dicamba restrictions.
The short version
- Internal EPA records revealed in litigation indicate the agency let Bayer choose among proposed restrictions for the drift-prone herbicide dicamba.[The Guardian]
- Bayer selected a less restrictive volatility standard allowing applications up to 95°F and secured an unproposed exemption for non-tank-mixed treatments.[The Guardian]
- The rules affect agricultural producers, orchards, and surrounding ecosystems that have historically suffered millions of acres of drift damage.[The Guardian]
- Litigants contend the current framework offers fewer safeguards than prior approvals that federal courts overturned twice.[The Guardian]
Key facts
- Internal EPA documents released in litigation show the agency gave Bayer options ranging from more to less protective for regulating dicamba volatility and runoff.[The Guardian]
- Bayer chose a volatility option allowing applications up to 95°F with reduced acreage rather than an 85°F cap, and EPA accepted its runoff mitigation choice.[The Guardian]
- The EPA granted an additional unproposed change requested by Bayer allowing full-field spraying at higher temperatures if the chemical is not tank mixed.[The Guardian]
- Courts have twice ordered dicamba removed from the market due to drift damage, though the agency subsequently re-approved it.[The Guardian]
What remains uncertain
- The legal validity of the proposed restrictions remains disputed as ongoing litigation challenges whether the measures provide adequate protection compared to earlier vacated rules.[The Guardian]
Sources
Outlet counts describe coverage, not independent confirmation. Reports may share a wire service or original source.