Entertainment
Docuseries team questions murder convictions of Dana Chandler
Creators of a new docuseries told The Hollywood Reporter that prosecutors failed to prove Dana Chandler's guilt.
The short version
- Creators of the docuseries 'A Killer Story' stated they would not have voted to convict Dana Chandler in the 2002 murders of Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness.[The Hollywood Reporter]
- Chandler underwent three separate trials for the double murder, which produced two guilty verdicts alongside one hung jury.[The Hollywood Reporter]
- The filmmakers spent nearly seven years examining the case and cited a lack of physical evidence, though journalist Joe Sexton noted he would not declare her innocent.[The Hollywood Reporter]
Key facts
- Dana Chandler was tried three times for the 2002 double murder of Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness, which resulted in two convictions and one hung jury.[The Hollywood Reporter]
- Director Matthew Galkin stated that a complete lack of physical evidence would have prevented him from finding Chandler guilty as a juror.[The Hollywood Reporter]
- Producer Joshua Levine argued that prosecutors failed to clear the reasonable doubt standard without hard evidence.[The Hollywood Reporter]
- Journalist Joe Sexton indicated he would not have convicted Chandler due to the prosecution failing to meet its burden, but added he would not pronounce her innocent.[The Hollywood Reporter]
- Production and reporting on the documentary series spanned almost seven years, starting before the COVID-19 pandemic arrived in the United States.[The Hollywood Reporter]
What remains uncertain
- Despite arguing the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, the docuseries creators do not declare whether Chandler is actually innocent.[The Hollywood Reporter]
Sources
Outlet counts describe coverage, not independent confirmation. Reports may share a wire service or original source.
- No One Involved in ‘A Killer Story’ Would Have Convicted Dana Chandler of Double MurderThe Hollywood Reporter metered