Politics
Supreme Court to review Arizona voter registration and citizenship proof laws
Election groups urge justices to overturn a ruling blocking state removal of noncitizens from voter rolls
The short version
- The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in December regarding Arizona laws requiring proof of citizenship and allowing voter roll purges within 90 days of an election.[Fox News]
- Election groups filed an amicus brief supporting the state, arguing that blocking these laws hampers the ability of states to enforce voter eligibility.[Fox News]
- Federal law generally restricts systematic voter removals within a 90-day pre-election window, creating a dispute over whether noncitizen removals are prohibited.[Fox News]
Key facts
- The Supreme Court scheduled oral arguments for December in RNC v. Mi Familia Vote to determine if Arizona voter laws violate the National Voter Registration Act.[Fox News]
- The contested Arizona statutes mandate proof of U.S. citizenship to register and permit the removal of noncitizens from voter rolls within 90 days of an election.[Fox News]
- The National Voter Registration Act requires states to finish systematic voter-removal programs at least 90 days before an election, granting exceptions for death, voter request, criminal conviction, or mental incapacity.[Fox News]
- Several election integrity organizations submitted an amicus brief contending the Ninth Circuit's ruling against the laws improperly limits state authority to enforce voter eligibility requirements.[Fox News]
What remains uncertain
- Whether the Supreme Court will determine that citizenship verification and noncitizen removals fall outside the National Voter Registration Act's 90-day quiet period remains undecided.[Fox News]
Sources
Outlet counts describe coverage, not independent confirmation. Reports may share a wire service or original source.