← Latest briefing

Health

Longevity startup Generation Lab claims generic drug pairing mimics antiaging blood exchange

The company is planning a pay-to-play study for its undisclosed two-drug injectable, raising scientific and methodological questions.

The short version

  • Generation Lab claims a new injectable combination of two existing generic drugs, dubbed 1-Generation, rejuvenates tissue and neutralizes aging factors in human blood.
  • The startup is keeping the identities of the two drugs confidential to protect its intellectual property ahead of seeking FDA exclusivity for a new use.
  • Generation Lab plans to launch a trial of over 100 participants who will pay to enroll, overseen by alternative-medicine and longevity physicians.
  • External experts and observers express skepticism over the lack of public data, undisclosed ingredients, and pay-to-play trial design.

Key facts

  • Generation Lab is promoting 1-Generation, an injectable combination of two existing generic drugs that it claims reawakens repair mechanisms and restores youth to tissues.[MIT Technology Review]
  • The company is withholding the specific identities of the two drugs to prevent competitors from copying the formula before obtaining regulatory exclusivity.[MIT Technology Review]
  • Generation Lab plans to conduct a clinical trial of 100 or more participants who will be required to pay for their own enrollment.[MIT Technology Review]
  • The planned trial will involve longevity and alternative-medicine practitioners, including BioReset Medical founder Matt Cook and Texas clinic operator Jeffrey Gladden.[MIT Technology Review]
  • Company insiders, including founder Irina Conboy and CEO Alina Su, report taking weekly injections and experiencing subjective benefits such as increased energy and mental clarity.[MIT Technology Review]

What remains uncertain

  • The identities and biological mechanisms of the two generic drugs in 1-Generation remain undisclosed to the public and external researchers.[MIT Technology Review]
  • Reported health benefits rely on self-reported anecdotes from company insiders rather than peer-reviewed clinical trials.[MIT Technology Review]

Sources